 |
Finally
Saturday morning had arrived and I was scheduled
to return home from a four-day business convention
in Phoenix, Arizona. I arrived at the airport early,
anxious to get home to see my wife and kids. The
airline I'd chosen had a "first come, first
served" policy of seat selection, so I had
my pick. |
I
chose the corner seat in the very last row. This location,
I thought, would enable me to study my Catechism of
the Catholic Church without interruption for the full
two and a half hours we'd be in flight. I needed the
time to make sure I was keeping up with our parish catechism
class. In addition, I'd recently been asked to speak
at a men's conference in Kansas City, so I thought God
might give me some in-flight inspiration. Little did
I know . . .
As I settled into my seat the stewardess announced that
we would have a full flight. Before long two young gentlemen
occupied the seats next to me. Tim took the middle chair
and his friend Mike sat on the end.
Tim watched as I kept going back and forth from the
Bible to the Catechism. Finally he asked, "Are
you a theology student?" I was so intent on what
I was reading that I didn't reply immediately. But after
a few seconds, I answered, "No."
I could sense that the conversation wasn't over, so
I muddled something about preparing for a Catholic men's
conference. Tim and Mike, as it turned out, were United
Pentecostal preachers returning from a convention of
their own.
GIVING
MY TESTIMONY
Almost immediately on takeoff, Tim launched into his
testimony. He explained that a girlfriend had once invited
him to attend a United Pentecostal Church. One evening
as they had entered the church together, Tim's girlfriend
had gone to do something and left him alone.
Wandering through the church, Tim had seen a man being
baptized. As he'd approached the baptismal font, he'd
felt a hand on his shoulder and looked around expecting
to find his girlfriend. But much to his surprise, no
one had been there. Suddenly Tim had realized that "it
was the Holy Spirit." A "rush" had come
on him, and he'd exclaimed to the minister that he too
wanted to be baptized.
I listened as Tim finished his story and then began
to launch into my own testimony. I wondered if he'd
ever heard a Catholic give his testimony. God had done
great things in my life, and I was excited that Tim
had given me the entrée to tell about them.

I explained how my girlfriend at the time had led me
as well into a deeper relationship with Christ. Although
I grew up Catholic, my girlfriend was not. Instead,
she was the daughter of a Southern Baptist preacher.
This had caused me to do some serious studying about
my faith and the differences between Catholics and Protestants.
I'd been open to going wherever God wanted me to go.
But to make a long story short, God had reaffirmed my
faith in His Church. In addition, He'd topped it all
off last year when Linda (my wife now for seven years)
had become Catholic!
Tim looked skeptical, so we headed off into the topic
of Church history. I began by asking him when the United
Pentecostal Church was founded. Where were its roots?
I relayed how my wife and I took great comfort in the
fact that we could trace our Church and its teachings
all the way back to the time of Christ. Tim said the
book of Acts shows when his church was founded. Having
been in this same discussion many times before with
people from different denominations, I began to push
Tim gently.
If that's your church, I asked him, then why did it
take so long to establish it? History shows that your
church is less than a hundred years old.
Tim, like so many Protestants, tried to claim various
groups throughout history as United Pentecostals. He
didn't know their names, but he insisted they were there.
I noted that my father-in-law, a devout Southern Baptist,
holds the same theory and that people within his own
denomination had refuted this claim (see James Edward
McGoldrick, Baptist Successionism: A Crucial Question
in Baptist History, Scarecrow Press, 1994).
I continued by saying that when my wife and I studied
the matter, we found that the Catholic Church was being
attested to as early as A.D. 100 by St. Ignatius of
Antioch when he said, "Wherever there is Christ
Jesus, there is the Catholic Church."
TALKING
ABOUT ST. PETER
Amazingly,
Tim switched to Matthew 16:18-19. Before he had finished
quoting it, I had the Bible opened to the passage:
And
I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will
build My Church, and the powers of death shall not
prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the
kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth
shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on
earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Tim
espoused the belief that in this passage, St. Peter
was being referred to in the Greek as petra, "small
stone," and his faith as petras, the large immovable
stone.
I asked Tim what language Christ spoke; he answered,
correctly, that Christ spoke Aramaic. I said, "If
Christ spoke Aramaic, then the original quote would
read, "Thou art Cephas, and upon this Cephas I
will build my Church." There could be no Greek-based
distinction in Christ's words between a "small"
and a "large" stone.
Next I went on to Isaiah 22:20-22 to show that Christ
was quoting Scripture when He gave St. Peter this unique
position. In that text, the Lord says:
In
that day I will call my servant Eliakim . . . and
I will clothe him with your robe, and will bind your
girdle on him, and will commit your authority to his
hand; and he shall be a father to the inhabitants
of Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. And I will
place on his shoulder the key to the house of David;
he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut,
and none shall open.
In
my Bible I had underlined in red all the wonderful things
given to Eliakim: an office, a robe, a sash ("girdle"),
authority and a key. In addition, in verse 21 Eliakim
is called a "father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem
and to the house of Judah." Catholics believe,
I told him, that this unique office is what Christ bestowed
upon St. Peter.
Now Tim began to shift emphasis. The discussion came
to seem more like a quiz. "How," he asked,
"do you square the Catholic Church's teaching with
the Scripture that says, "Call no man father"
(see Matt. 23:9)?
"Well, Tim," I began, "one thing is for
sure: Jesus wasn't giving us a vocabulary lesson here.
Otherwise, why does He use the term 'father' in Luke
16:24 in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus? Or
why does St. Paul refer to himself as a 'father' in
the faith to the Corinthians (see 1 Cor. 4:15), or why
does St. Stephen repeatedly refer to the men at his
trial as 'fathers' (see Acts chapter 7)?"
Tim didn't really think about my answer. He just moved
to another question. "How do you justify the Catholic
Church's teaching on Mary in light of Scripture?"
Now Tim and Mike couldn't have known this, but the topic
I had been asked to address at the Catholic men's conference
was "What to Say When a Non-Catholic Says . . ."
And the first topic I had planned to address was Mary.
Although I think every Catholic must be ready to answer
this question, I'd been particularly preparing for just
such an opportunity.
Propelled by excitement and maybe too much caffeine
(I'd just downed about a quart of Coke while waiting
to board the plane), I think I exploded on Tim. I began
with Genesis 3:15, pointing out that it was the woman's
seed (a strange thing to say, since it is the man's
seed that contributes to offspring) at enmity with the
serpent. I also noted that the pronoun is unclear in
verse 15: It could read "He," "She,"
or as the King James Version says, "It shall bruise
[or crush] thy head . . . ."
Next, to help Tim see the special place of honor and
authority reserved in biblical times for the mother
of a king, I went to 1 Kings 2:19. That text refers
to the queen mother's seat at the right hand of King
Solomon's throne. She was called the giberah, which
means "Lady."
I asked Tim whether he'd ever heard Catholics call Mary
"Our Lady." He had, but I could sense I was
losing his interest rapidly. So I switched to talking
about Mary as the Ark of the New Covenant. As I continued,
Mike sat forward with a keen interest.
Up to this point Mike had been quietly listening, but
soon I found out why. He said he'd grown up Catholic,
and in his native country, they deified Mary, asking
her to grant their prayers and petitions. He added that
this, along with the worship of saints, was in direct
conflict with Scripture.
THE
SAINTS AREN'T DEAD
Mike was stern about his condemnation, but
he remained kind in discussion. He went on to say he'd
been a Pentecostal preacher for nineteen years. No matter
how I might "dress it up," he insisted, it
was still in conflict with God's Word to pray to dead
people.
I told Mike that Catholics don't pray to dead people.
They pray to people alive in Christ. The Scripture says
that death cannot separate us from Christ (see Rom.
8:38); therefore we have the Church militant on earth
and the Church triumphant in heaven in total union as
the one body of Christ! "Mike," I said, "the
saints are more alive than you and I are!"
Again, Tim and Mike began topic jumping, Mike emphatically
said that he couldn't fathom our allowing a mere man
(a priest) to forgive our sins, and that this practice
also flew in the face of sacred Scripture.
"Christ nowhere gave man the ability to forgive
sins," said Mike.
"Well," I replied, "what about John 20:23?"
"Read it to me," he said.
I read verse 22 as well as 23. Mike didn't have a good
response, so he tried to dismiss it casually.
Finally I grew tired of being on the hot seat. So as
Tim began another challenge, I stopped him.
"Now, wait a minute," I said. "I've answered
your questions about calling no man father, about Mary,
about the saints and the papacy. Now I have a question
for you. Show me where the Bible says that everything
should be contained in sacred Scripture alone."
Tim
quickly retorted, "Show me where it says I should
follow your Church's traditions!"
Well, I couldn't let that go before I made him show
me sola scriptura, so I quickly quoted 2 Thessalonians
2:15: "Therefore brothers, stand firm and hold
fast to the traditions you received from us, either
by word or by letter."
"Now," I insisted as I handed them my Bible,
"where does it say that Scripture alone should
be our sole authority?" Tim said nothing, and Mike
sat back in his seat. I waited through a few seconds
of silence, then I looked over Tim to Mike. "You've
become very quiet," I said jokingly.
"I'm thinking," responded Mike.
After more discussion, Mike looked intently at me, and
the conversation seemed to come to a screeching halt.
"Kevin," he said sincerely as he pointed to
Tim and himself, "then how do you view us?"
I knew that if I showed Mike some kind of triumphalistic
attitude he would easily dismiss me. So I looked lovingly
at Mike and said, "I view you as separated brothers
in Christ."
Mike quickly retorted, "Separated?"
"Yes, Mike, because you don't hold to the authority
of the Church that Christ founded. You're still my brother,
but separated from the Church that is 'the pillar and
foundation of truth,' as it says in 1 Timothy 3:15."
"Read that verse to me," Mike said. When I
did, he just shook his head and said, "I guess
we'll just have to agree to disagree."
GOD'S
LITTLE SURPRISE
We'd been talking now for over two hours,
and I didn't want to let it go that easily. Yet I recalled
that it is good to talk to Christians in a loving manner
even if we disagree, so if an unbeliever overhears us
he won't be driven away. So for the last few minutes
of the flight we made small talk, and I wondered whether
I'd come on too strong.
Even so, I thought, they were firing questions at me.
So I said a quick prayer as the plane landed in Kansas
City.
I was home, but Tim and Mike were traveling on to Chicago,
so they let me out of the inside seat and we shook hands.
As I gathered my possessions, I noticed a man in front
of me staring at us. I'd been so engrossed by our discussion
that I'd hardly noticed the man before. Yet as I look
back on it, I remember now seeing him turn his head
and place his ear between the seats as if straining
to hear our discussion.
When I grabbed my coat and passed the man, he quietly
said, "God bless you."
I didn't quite hear him, so I said, "Excuse me?"
Again he gently said, "God bless you."
I replied, "Thank you," and began the long
trek down the aisle to exit the plane.
As I walked along, I was filled with excitement and
awe at the ways of God. Maybe that man in front of us
was Catholic, and his faith had been strengthened. Maybe
he'd been away from the Church for years, and he was
now thinking about coming back. Maybe he was a non-Catholic,
and the arguments had pierced his soul.
Only God knows.
|